Bob Hughes wrote:
> Well, good you said that, program crashing problem will likely get fixed 
> then. heh-heh

:-)

> However, since initial frame of zero is unavailable, this must mean 
> something was changed. I had mostly used that as the starting number for 
> mpeg creation by running a batch file which accepts a number of digits at 
> the end of a file name, anim000 for example, and counts up from there. It 
> can be worked around, of course. Makes me wonder, though, why it must be 1 
> and not 0 anymore. Was there a special reason involved or was it about ways 
> people expect counting to begin?

It was actually never documented to work, and as such never checked if it 
does work. It is possible that previous versions did work with 0 (certainly 
no negative values) for the most part, but I certainly would not want to 
claim the results were predictable for all animation features (i.e. field 
rendering, subframe rendering, etc).

	Thorsten

Post a reply to this message